open-telemetry / open-telemetry/shared-workflows
PR dashboard result looks incorrect
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 18
- Avg merge
- 22h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 75
Description
PR: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation/pull/19829
Current live status comment:
Pull request dashboard status
Waiting on the author · refreshed 2026-09-03 12:47 UTC
Respond to 1 review item (e.g. link a commit, explain why not, ask a follow-up):
- Inline threads: 1
What looks incorrect:
It would be nice if comment addressed directly to a maintainer (reviewer?) who is not the pr author, e.g. @trask is this the correct way or should the standard extractor be modified to handle this?
would rout to reviewers
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by tracing the PR dashboard status and review-item routing for PR 19829 in the shared-workflows repository. Check how comments addressed to a maintainer who is not the PR author are classified, then verify the dashboard routes that item to reviewers rather than the author.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- ci-cd
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100