New circular buffer using faa instead of cas to optimize performance

Describe the solution you'd like

I noticed that original circular buffer using by batch span processor use lock free MPSC queu based on CAS. When experiencing intense multithreading contention, Compare-And-Swap (CAS) exhibits poorer scalability compared to Fetch-And-Add (FAA). In reference of https://github.com/dbittman/waitfree-mpsc-queue, this pr attempt to implement a wait-free MPSC (Multiple Producer, Single Consumer) queue using FAA. Base on original benchmark, it indicate that this approach demonstrates better performance scalability.

Run on (48 X 2593.99 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
  L1 Data 32 KiB (x24)
  L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x24)
  L2 Unified 256 KiB (x24)
  L3 Unified 30720 KiB (x2)
Load Average: 7.85, 5.70, 4.48
----------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                      Time             CPU   Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------
BM_BaselineBuffer/1     10178537 ns        51528 ns         1000
BM_BaselineBuffer/2      7408646 ns        69828 ns         1000
BM_BaselineBuffer/4      7684772 ns       127549 ns         1000
BM_BaselineBuffer/8      7222459 ns       278660 ns         1000
BM_BaselineBuffer/16     6716972 ns       603712 ns         1215
BM_LockFreeBuffer/1      3915343 ns        53125 ns         1000
BM_LockFreeBuffer/2      4798406 ns        70581 ns         1000
BM_LockFreeBuffer/4      4562709 ns       128493 ns         1000
BM_LockFreeBuffer/8      4935221 ns       289996 ns         1000
BM_LockFreeBuffer/16     5187913 ns       618856 ns         1081
BM_OptimizedBuffer/1     4256507 ns        49970 ns         1000
BM_OptimizedBuffer/2     3398719 ns        67712 ns         1000
BM_OptimizedBuffer/4     3204749 ns       127378 ns         1000
BM_OptimizedBuffer/8     3230722 ns       296507 ns         1000
BM_OptimizedBuffer/16    3859005 ns       769220 ns         1000

More detail see draft pr: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/pull/3644

Describe alternatives you've considered
Which alternative solutions or features have you considered?

Additional context
Add any other context about the feature request here.

_{Tip: React with 👍 to help prioritize this issue. Please use comments to provide useful context, avoiding +1 or me too, to help us triage it. Learn more here.}

Start with the existing batch span processor circular buffer and draft PR #3644; compare the proposed FAA-based wait-free MPSC queue with the current CAS implementation. Reproduce the listed benchmarks and verify correctness with multiple producers and one consumer. Done means the alternative is correct and its performance benefits are supported by benchmark results.