open-telemetry / open-telemetry/community
Sustainable process for community support
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 314
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Description
I'm starting to understand that this repository is about process, how we encourage or steer desired behaviors that result in community success. One thing I noticed yesterday (my time) was that no one answered questions on the collector slack. I pinged my colleagues and of course folks pitched in, but I got the impression that while we raise issues about how to not confuse users, how to define vocabulary etc, maybe we haven't focused on the critical support aspect?
Close this out if I just missed something, but I suspect there's a way of incentivizing community support in ways that show up very loudly as much as or even more than things like PR stats or comment counts in devstats. In my history of OSS, slack support is a very large part of community success and I'd love to see folks who do well on this, either individually, as friends or even as companies become better incentivised and recognized for this.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing support activity in the collector Slack and how devstats currently recognizes PRs and comment counts. Define a sustainable support-incentive and recognition process, with a clear way to evaluate whether community support is being acknowledged.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100