open-feature / open-feature/flagd
[BUG] [File Provider] Support File Formats
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 997
- Forks
- 136
- Avg merge
- 4d 8h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
Observed behavior
There are differences in the file provider regarding supported file formats.
| SDK | JSON | YAML |
|---|---|---|
| Java | y | n |
| JS | y | y |
| Python | y | y |
| .net | y | ? |
| ... |
the question is, what is the expected behavior and what do we want to support? eg. is yaml just an optional nice to have feature?
Expected Behavior
unified behavior or at least definition for all our languages and ideally tests to cover this bit
Steps to reproduce
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the file-provider behavior described for the Java, JS, Python, and .NET SDKs, starting with their existing format support and tests. Define the expected cross-language JSON and YAML behavior, then add coverage showing that the supported formats are consistent across the SDKs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp, go, java, javascript, python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100