open-compass / open-compass/VLMEvalKit
Unable to reproduce any of the Gemma 3 results
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 768
- Avg merge
- 1d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 17
Description
Hi,
I'm working on re creating some gemma 3 benchmark results. But the scores I get are always very far from the papers or the VLMEvalKit website. It's almost as if the chat template is wrong or something. Example : Running the ChartQA_TEST dataset on Gemma3-4B gives an overall score of 7.2 instead of 30-ish (Also, the paper announced around 70 for this test so this is another mystery). Same for the other datasets I've tried.
Can anyone re-create any gemma 3 results ?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Gemma 3 evaluation path and reproduce the ChartQA_TEST run described in the issue, comparing its 7.2 score with the paper and VLMEvalKit website results. Done means identifying the source of the discrepancy or documenting a confirmed, reproducible result across the reported datasets.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100