[Workload]: metrics-emitter
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Workload Name
metrics-emitter
Workload Description
A workload that runs a Prometheus-compatible metrics endpoint inside a VM, exposing configurable gauges, counters, and histograms with tunable label cardinality and scrape-ready /metrics path. Produces sustained, realistic metric signals that monitoring partners can scrape via OpenShift's native ServiceMonitor/PodMonitor pipeline.
This is the missing link between virtwork's in-VM workloads and the Prometheus-based monitoring ecosystem on OpenShift. The current workloads (cpu, memory, disk, database) generate real system pressure, but monitoring partners need scrapeable application metrics — not just node-level signals. A metrics-emitter VM acts as a synthetic application that exposes the same kind of metric surface a real business application would: request duration histograms, active connection gauges, error counters, queue depth gauges — all with configurable cardinality to stress the partner's ingestion pipeline.
Tooling and Packages
- Tool:
avalanche(Prometheus metric load generator by Prometheus team) or a lightweight custom exporter avalancheflags:--metric-count=500 --label-count=10 --series-count=5 --port=9101 --value-interval=30- RPM packages: none —
avalancheis a single Go binary - systemd service command:
/usr/local/bin/avalanche --metric-count=500 --label-count=10 --series-count=5 --port=9101 - Exposes port 9101 (Prometheus metrics) via Kubernetes Service
- Configurable parameters: metric count, label count (cardinality), series count per metric, value change interval, port
VM Count Model
Single VM (like cpu, memory, disk)
Required Resources
- Kubernetes Service (for inter-VM communication)
- Persistent storage (DataVolume)
- Kubernetes Secret (for credentials or config)
- Additional CPU/memory beyond defaults
- GPU or special device passthrough
Cloud-Init Details
write_files:
- path: /etc/systemd/system/virtwork-metrics-emitter.service
content: |
[Unit]
Description=Virtwork Prometheus metrics emitter
After=network-online.target
Wants=network-online.target
[Service]
Type=simple
ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/avalanche \
--metric-count=500 \
--label-count=10 \
--series-count=5 \
--port=9101 \
--value-interval=30
Restart=always
RestartSec=5
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
runcmd:
- curl -Lo /usr/local/bin/avalanche https://github.com/prometheus-community/avalanche/releases/download/v0.6.0/avalanche_0.6.0_linux_amd64.tar.gz
- tar -xzf /usr/local/bin/avalanche -C /usr/local/bin/
- chmod +x /usr/local/bin/avalanche
- systemctl enable --now virtwork-metrics-emitter.service
The Kubernetes Service should expose port 9101 with appropriate labels for ServiceMonitor discovery:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: virtwork-metrics-emitter-0
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: virtwork
virtwork/component: metrics-emitter
virtwork/metrics: "true"
spec:
ports:
- name: metrics
port: 9101
targetPort: 9101
selector:
# matches VM pod labels
Use Case
- Monitoring platform partners (Datadog, Dynatrace, Sysdig, Grafana Labs): Need scrapeable Prometheus endpoints from VMs to validate that their agents correctly discover, scrape, and ingest application-level metrics from KubeVirt VMs — not just node/kubelet metrics. High cardinality (many labels × many series) stresses ingestion pipelines and validates the partner's ability to handle metric volume at scale.
- Prometheus/Thanos/Mimir ecosystem partners: Need realistic scrape targets to validate long-term storage, compaction, and query performance against VM-sourced metrics. Configurable metric count and cardinality lets partners tune the load to match their customers' real-world profiles.
- OpenShift platform validation: Validates that the full Prometheus pipeline — ServiceMonitor discovery → scrape → remote write → partner product — works correctly when the scrape target is a KubeVirt VM rather than a pod. This exercises a code path that's distinct from container-based scraping and is less commonly tested.
- Capacity planning partners: Need predictable, tunable metric volume to validate alerting thresholds and dashboard rendering under load.
Additional Context
avalancheis maintained by the Prometheus community and designed specifically for this purpose: generating configurable Prometheus metric load. It's the standard tool for testing Prometheus-compatible backends.- The Kubernetes Service is critical — it enables OpenShift's ServiceMonitor to discover and scrape the VM's metrics endpoint through the standard Prometheus operator pipeline. This is what makes this workload uniquely valuable on OpenShift vs. a bare VM.
- Configurable parameters to expose via CLI/YAML:
metric-count(number of distinct metrics),label-count(labels per metric — controls cardinality),series-count(series per metric),value-interval(seconds between value changes),port. - Consider also generating a sample
ServiceMonitorCR in dry-run output to show partners how to wire up scraping. This isn't a virtwork-managed resource but a documentation/example artifact. - At 500 metrics × 5 series × 10 labels, a single VM produces ~2,500 time series — comparable to a moderately instrumented microservice. Scaling to 5,000+ metrics or 50+ labels tests high-cardinality ingestion.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the existing cpu, memory, and disk workload implementations and their Kubernetes Service generation. Review how cloud-init and systemd services are defined, then compare the proposed avalanche command and port 9101 Service labels with the workload conventions. Done means a metrics-emitter VM exposes the configured Prometheus endpoint and its Service supports ServiceMonitor or PodMonitor discovery.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, kubernetes, prometheus
- Domain
- infrastructure, observability-sre
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100