Plan migration from local data.db to cloud-backed storage
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 35
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 17h 19m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Context
Future work from docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-24-local-libsql-migration-design.md.
The local libsql migration and Turso cloud configuration model are prerequisites. This issue should define an upgrade-friendly path for existing agents that already have local data.db state.
Scope
- Define how existing local
data.dbcontents move to a cloud-backed primary or replica setup. - Preserve upgrade-friendly behavior for already-deployed agents.
- Avoid sandbox deletion, agent recreation, or manual state surgery.
- Define dry-run, validation, rollback, and observability requirements.
Acceptance Criteria
- Migration path works for already-deployed agents with existing data.
- The process validates schema version and data integrity before switching modes.
- Failures leave the agent in a usable local-only state.
- Documentation states operator steps and recovery behavior.
Out Of Scope
- Initial local
libsqldriver migration. - General cloud backup UX.
- Dashboard visualizations for sync state.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-24-local-libsql-migration-design.md and the existing local data.db and Turso configuration behavior it describes. Define the upgrade, validation, dry-run, rollback, and observability requirements for deployed agents. Done means the migration preserves existing state, validates schema and integrity, and leaves failures usable in local-only mode with documented operator recovery steps.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cloud, databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100