Move Storage Fees into Transaction Fees
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 361
- Forks
- 159
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Issue To Be Solved
Currently storage fees are too complicated for dapps to handle.
There is ongoing discussion about new transaction fees ( gas usage etc ). Don't you think it would be feasible to get rid of Storage Fees in this opportunity ? I am sure there can be a mathematical sweet spot there.
Some options:
- Increased fee for writing to storage depending on the storage usage.
- Some fixed fee for storage read / write ( Depending on the bytes read/write )
Still minimum account balance for creation can stay ( or adjusted ) , but it without storage fees, user experience would be much better in my opinion.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the transaction-fee and storage-fee areas, then review the existing fee discussion; done would require an agreed fee model and an implementation scope before coding can begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- blockchain
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 18/100