Wrong Argentina withholding payment date behaviour

In Argentina pay witholding documentation To date and From do not do what they say. In account_payment_register.py:132-144 it says that withholding will not be applied if date is after from_date (or from_date is empty) or if date is before to_date, which is exactly the opposite of what documentation says.

    @api.depends('partner_id', 'payment_date')
    def _compute_l10n_ar_withholding_ids(self):
        for wizard in self:
            date = wizard.payment_date or fields.Date.context_today(self)
            partner_taxes = self.env['l10n_ar.partner.tax'].search([
                *self.env['l10n_ar.partner.tax']._check_company_domain(wizard.company_id),
                '|', ('from_date', '>=', date), ('from_date', '=', False),
                '|', ('to_date', '<=', date), ('to_date', '=', False),
                ('partner_id', '=', wizard.partner_id.commercial_partner_id.id),
                ('tax_id.l10n_ar_withholding_payment_type', '=', wizard.partner_type),
                ('tax_id.active', '=', True)
            ])
            wizard.l10n_ar_withholding_ids = [Command.clear()] + [Command.create({'tax_id': x.tax_id.id}) for x in partner_taxes]

It could be a bug in code, but I think that from_date and to_date were intended to set an exemption for this withholding, that is when that withholding does not to apply to a specific range because tax Agency wanted to make an exemption.

Start with the Argentina withholding documentation and account_payment_register.py:132-144, comparing the documented To date and From date behavior with the shown search conditions. Determine whether the documentation or the implementation reflects the intended exemption semantics; done means the intended date range is unambiguous and the affected source or documentation is updated accordingly.