ocsigen / ocsigen/ocsigen.github.io
Better looking?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
May i suggest to try to use an other template? Like for instance:
- http://phlow.github.io/feeling-responsive/blog/
- http://ojs.xyz/solid-jekyll/blog/
- http://themes.3rdwavemedia.com/demo/devaid/
- http://mmistakes.github.io/skinny-bones-jekyll/
- http://blog.sendtoinc.com/
I know this kind of thing is totally subjective but i find the actual template a bit too "raw". If there is a consensus about a better looking template, i can try to make a PR to integrate the new chosen one.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the linked template examples and the existing site layout before choosing a direction. The issue does not name files, tests, or a specific replacement, so completion would require agreement on a new design and a defined template integration scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100