[Feature] support more storage engine
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
feature
help wanted
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 1.6k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In the original design, I planned to support more storage engines, such as:
A storage engine based on memory.
A storage engine based on disk with a B+ tree.
In fact, if we follow the model of MySQL, we may be able to support a storage engine based on disk with an LSM tree.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue proposes memory, B+ tree, and LSM-tree storage engines but names no files, entry points, tests, or selected implementation target. Start by reviewing the existing storage-engine architecture and clarify which engine should be supported. Done should mean one agreed engine is implemented with coverage for its expected database behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100