[feature request] make private modules a Predicate_lang
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- OCaml
- Stars
- 1.9k
- Forks
- 500
- Avg merge
- 15h 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 277
Description
Dear developers,
I like your Ordered set language very much, but was rather disappointed that private_modules (btw, that one doesn't have a HTML anchor to link directly to) is modules and not Ordered set language. Is there a good reason for this?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the private_modules documentation with the Ordered set language documentation, including the missing HTML anchor noted in the issue. Determine whether private_modules can accept the same predicate language; done means the requested syntax is supported and its documentation is directly linkable.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ocaml
- Domain
- build-system
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100