obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon

long bones - not always appendicular?

Open
#383 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Emacs Lisp
Stars
163
Forks
43
Avg merge
1d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading issue 383 and the cited PubMed article to determine whether the ontology's treatment of long bones is incorrect. Confirm the intended anatomical classification with the project context, then update the relevant ontology assertion; done means the classification reflects the evidence and the issue's concern is resolved.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
bioinformatics
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.