obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon
Using Uberon terms with human labels
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Emacs Lisp
- Stars
- 163
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Is there a plan for providing Uberon terms with human/clinically relevant labels? Re: https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/1522#issuecomment-547575843
I see that some human terms have been tagged with "human_preferred" (https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/278). Can those annotations be used to swap the general labels with their human counterparts?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked Uberon issues #1522 and #278, especially the discussion of human_preferred annotations. No files or tests are identified in this issue. Clarify whether those annotations should replace general labels and define the expected scope before implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100