obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon

ZFA and Uberon mappings often differ on relationship type

Open
#175 1 comment 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@mellybelly is already working on this.

Since Feb 1, 2013.

composite
Dominant language
Emacs Lisp
Stars
163
Forks
43
Avg merge
1d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

following are cases where uberon uses a different relation from ZFA. Note that neither is definitely right nor wrong. Nor is it the case that the relations must match. However, for each substitution type a general pattern should be documented. Explicitly allowed differences can be added as notes on the relationship in Uberon.

develops_from->has_developmental_contribution_from

develops_from->part_of

part_of->channels_from

part_of->connects

part_of->continuous_with

part_of->develops_from

part_of->located_in

part_of->overlaps

part_of->subclass

part_of->supplies

part_of->surrounds

subclass->develops_from

subclass->develops_into

subclass->part_of

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.