obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon
is 'flexor digitorum profundus' definitely a 'forelimb stylopod muscle'?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Emacs Lisp
- Stars
- 163
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
I am looking into some conflicts between Uberon and EMAPA. One stems from 'flexor digitorum profundus', which is part of the forearm in EMAPA. The forearm is mapped to UBERON zeugopod. Uberon says this muscle is a 'forelimb stylopod muscle'. I'm no expert but it looks zeugopod-ish in this picture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexor_digitorum_profundus_muscle
Which is right?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the Uberon classification of flexor digitorum profundus with the EMAPA placement of the muscle in the forearm and zeugopod, using the linked anatomy reference as context. Done means resolving the stylopod-versus-zeugopod conflict and documenting or applying the agreed ontology correction; no file or test is named.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100