obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon
Reproductive gland and Gonad
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Emacs Lisp
- Stars
- 163
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
It seems to me like the terms Reproductive gland and Gonad mean similar things and at least Gonad should subclass Reproductive gland
Yet there seem to be to very different trees:
organ/gland/reproductive gland/male reproductive gland
multicellular anatomical structure/reproductive structure/reproductive organ/gonad
Reproductive organ not being a subclass of organ also seems strange.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the ontology branches listed in the issue: organ/gland/reproductive gland/male reproductive gland and multicellular anatomical structure/reproductive structure/reproductive organ/gonad. Review the definitions and intended relationships of Gonad, Reproductive gland, Reproductive organ, and organ; done means the hierarchy is resolved consistently with the project’s modeling conventions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100