obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon
'part of' o develops_from' -> develops_from ?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Emacs Lisp
- Stars
- 163
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
I'm wondering if this chain is correct. Chatted with @mellybelly about this and was looking for impact
by querying (develops_from some ectoderm) and (develops_from some mesoderm)
The chain is responsible for 6 subclasses
perilymph
otolymph
endolymph
"notochordal fluid"
"dorsal meso-duodenum"
"chorionic ectoderm"
I'm not sure about whether these are correct or not - don't know enough anatomy.
However it should not be right in the following scenario.
A' develops from A
B' develops from B
at some point A',B' fuse to make C, with parts retaining their identity.
At that point, C develops from A' and C develops from B'
A' part of C
C develops from A',B'
but A' doesn't develop from B'
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the develops_from and part_of assertions for perilymph, otolymph, endolymph, notochordal fluid, dorsal meso-duodenum, and chorionic ectoderm. Compare them with the proposed fusion scenario and the develops_from queries for ectoderm and mesoderm; done means the relation choices are anatomically and logically agreed upon.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100