obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon
Update stylopodial skeleton and related terms
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Emacs Lisp
- Stars
- 163
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Alex and I would like to make the following changes, we wanted to check with everyone that this is reasonable:
We propose to change the label of 'stylopodial skeleton'' to 'stylopod bone' and obsolete 'upper arm bone' and 'upper leg bone', with replaced_by humerus and femur, respectively.
In the stylopod, a collective skeleton term would be one and the same as the 'upper arm bone' or 'upper leg bone', in that there is only one skeletal element in forelimb/hindlimb stylopod (to Alex's expert knowledge).
Humerus and femur would then need to be asserted as subclasses of 'stylopod bone' (currently they don't infer to be part_of the stylopodial skeleton).
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing ontology declarations for “stylopodial skeleton,” “upper arm bone,” “upper leg bone,” humerus, and femur, along with the project’s term-obsoletion conventions. Done means renaming the collective term to “stylopod bone,” obsoleting the two old terms with their replacements, and making humerus and femur subclasses of the new term.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100