obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon

Inferior/Superior wall of ventricle

Open
#1,453 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Emacs Lisp
Stars
163
Forks
43
Avg merge
1d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

We have a need for more specific terms of right ventricle myocardium [UBERON:0006567] & left ventricle myocardium [UBERON:0006566] to further break down the regions of the ventricle wall so that a lab's samples can be more accurately annotated.
We would really appreciate some guidance on how to reconcile various reference to figure out which terms should be generated.

antero-superior, postero-inferior, and posterior wall of right/left ventricle
https://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/article/10/8/iii3/2396960

antero-superior, postero-lateral, inferior, and antero-septal wall of right/left ventricle
https://ecgwaves.com/left-ventricle-ischemia-acute-myocardial-infarction-coronary-artery/

septal, mid-anterior, apical-anterior, extensive anterior, lateral, and inferior wall of right/left ventricle
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624924

Thanks,
Jason (ENCODE DCC)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with UBERON:0006567 and UBERON:0006566, then compare the three cited anatomical references and their wall terminology. Reconcile the differing regional schemes with project guidance before deciding which right- and left-ventricle wall terms should be generated. Done means the requested terms and their distinctions are agreed and added to the ontology.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
content
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.