obophenotype / obophenotype/uberon
Procoracoid identity issues
@cmungall is already working on this.
Since Feb 16, 2022.
- Dominant language
- Emacs Lisp
- Stars
- 163
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
According to Vickaryous and Hall 2006 the identity of the reptilian "coracoid" is not what has been previously suggested. They postulate that of the two ancestral "coracoid" elements (termed here the procoraoid and the metacoracoid) that it is the meta, not the procoracoid, that makes up the majority of the "coracoid" element in modern reptiles (similar to the state of affairs in modern mammals). I suggest we contact Brian Hall and have a discussion on the nomenclature of this element. I think that we change the terminology of the "coracoid bone" to have the preferred term read the "procoracoid" and "metacoracoid" respectively. This would require users to specify which element they wish to select when they annotate.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.