test coverage, missing usage hints with tests or documentation

Open
#248 3 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
lua
Domain
documentation, testing

Research direction

Start by reviewing the repository's luacov setup and the README, then inspect the listed modules: benchmark, bit, fun, functional, operators, debug_utils, log, and reload. Decide which missing coverage or usage hints are in scope, then verify that the selected modules have tests or documented usage and that luacov reports the expected coverage.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

As of now there is no test coverage, ie with luacov.

Further I noticed the following files have no test coverage and neither documentation in the README:

  1. benchmark
  2. bit
  3. fun, functional and operators
  4. debug_utils
  5. log
  6. debug_utils
  7. reload
Dominant language
Lua
Stars
3.5k
Forks
340
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from nvim-lua/plenary.nvim

All issues in nvim-lua/plenary.nvim

Similar issues

More Lua issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.