`which` without `--all` should return record
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
category:enhancement
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 40.5k
- Forks
- 2.3k
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 85
Description
Related problem
I have to get 0 from which output every time while it obviously always has 1 item except when it's empty
Describe the solution you'd like
Return a record instead of table
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context and details
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the implementation and tests for the which command, then compare its current output with the requested behavior. Verify that which without --all returns a single record when a match exists and preserves empty behavior when there is no match.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100