npm / npm/rfcs

[RRFC] Explicit ecosystem claim on package.json for cross-ecosystem disambiguation

Open
#913 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
777
Forks
267
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Cross-ecosystem note: historically Dub (D's package manager) also used package.json as a recipe filename. Overlapping keys make ownership ambiguous. Dub is moving toward refusing obvious npm files (https://github.com/dlang/dub/issues/3118, https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/3136) and preferring dub.json.

A durable fix is an explicit ecosystem claim on package.json (e.g. "packageFormat": "npm" / "packageFormat": "dub"), agreed across ecosystems—not only JS-internal heuristics.

Primary write-up filed with the OpenJS Package Metadata Interoperability group (better fit for field-level package.json meaning). Linking here so the npm CLI RFC track is aware if a CLI-side recommendation is desired later.

OpenJS issue: (will update with URL after open)

Dub issue: (will update with URL after open)

Not asking npm to abandon package.json ownership—only to consider documenting a positive claim so other tools can skip or accept the file unambiguously.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading Dub issue 3118 and pull request 3136, then follow the OpenJS Package Metadata Interoperability write-up when its URL is available. Done would mean an agreed ecosystem-claim approach and a documented npm CLI recommendation; the issue names no npm file, test, or implementation entry point.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript
Domain
documentation, tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.