AI created PRs
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 7.7k
- Forks
- 879
- Avg merge
- 2d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 68
Description
In the last days we got PRs which seem to bs AI created. Obviously "good first issue" s are targetted.
The point of a good first issue is not, that we encourage people to use AI to fix simple tasks but to encourage devs to participate and contribute to a project.
I have no issue with using AI, but then there should be already a quality control by the "implementer" and not by us alone.
Some tasks are faster implemented in good quality than reviewing that AI slop. We are not here to give input so that the person takes our remarks to let claude or whatever fix the remark.
It is so annoying...
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Read the discussion first and seek a concrete maintainer decision about the desired contribution or review policy; done cannot be defined until that scope is agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100