CI Reliability 2026-09-18
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 57
- Forks
- 20
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Failures in node-test-pull-request/77410 to node-test-pull-request/77575 that failed 2 or more PRs
(Generated with ncu-ci walk pr --stats=true --markdown reports/2026-09-18.md)
| UTC Time | RUNNING | SUCCESS | UNSTABLE | ABORTED | FAILURE | Green Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 00:15 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 11 | 59 | 6.10% |
Open https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-09-18.md to see failure details
Progress
-
Command "git reset --hard" returned status code 128:(2) -
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'(2) -
Failed to trigger fanned build(17) -
fatal: No rebase in progress?(6) -
ERROR: Step ‘Publish JUnit test result report’ failed: No test report files were found. Configuration error?(4) -
error: could not apply 61890720c8a... add readme and initial code(4) -
Error: uncaught(3) -
FATAL: Channel "hudson.remoting.Channel@40c355d9:JNLP4-connect connection from ... Remote call on JNLP4-connect connection from 67.158.54.159/67.158.54.159:48828 failed. The channel is closing down or has closed down(2) -
Failed to trigger node-test-commit(2) -
fatal: no rebase in progress(2) -
parallel/test-http-server-connection-list-when-close(3) -
parallel/test-debugger-extract-function-name(2) -
parallel/test-util-throttle(2) -
pummel/test-buffer-large-size-slowbuffer(2) -
sequential/test-worker-prof(2)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked node-test-pull-request builds and the generated report at reports/2026-09-18.md, using the listed failure messages and test names as entry points. Determine which failures are actionable and independently reproducible; done means addressing the selected CI failures and confirming that the affected builds no longer reproduce them.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- git, node.js, shell
- Domain
- ci-cd, devops, testing-qa, tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100