MIMEType Performance

I know that MIMEType is recently added and under Experimental flag. But I want to draw a attention on it's performance.
It is not the slowest compare to the userland module, but it can do better.

util#MIMEType x 1,206,781 ops/sec ±0.22% (96 runs sampled)
fast-content-type-parse#parse x 3,752,236 ops/sec ±0.42% (96 runs sampled)
fast-content-type-parse#safeParse x 3,675,645 ops/sec ±1.09% (94 runs sampled)
content-type#parse x 1,452,582 ops/sec ±0.37% (95 runs sampled)
busboy#parseContentType x 924,306 ops/sec ±0.43% (94 runs sampled)
Fastest is fast-content-type-parse#parse

I am considering replacing MIMEType for the Content-Type parsing in fastify but the performance is the main drawback.
The main reason behind using MIMEType is the .essence property did a great job in unifying the Browser and Server in terms of Content-Type guessing / matching and prevent the similar security issue like https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/advisories/GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh

Refs https://github.com/fastify/fastify/issues/4502

Start by reproducing the MIMEType benchmark described in the issue and compare it with fast-content-type-parse, content-type, and busboy. Investigate the existing MIMEType implementation and benchmark results; done means identifying and validating a performance improvement without losing the essence behavior or the Content-Type security properties referenced here.