nodejs / nodejs/package-maintenance

Engaging Enterprise teams to better understand challenges at scale

Open
#138 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
No language data
Stars
423
Forks
147
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Background

As part of the @nodejs/user-feedback Initiative, we've kicked off a work stream to better engage with large Enterprise teams, with the goal to enable a two-way channel of value-sharing and feedback between large corporations and the node community.

The value of engaging is to capture the context of large teams in large organizations (200+ devs, 1000+ applications) around slower operations, compliance demands, training and knowledge sharing, as well as varying levels of maturity of their technology practices.

A great recent examples such context: Security and Compliance needs in Enterprise as told by @isaacs OSS Risk & Compliance

The ask

Discuss how to best assist in bringing useful / actionable insights to the @nodejs/package-maintenance team.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing the issue background and the linked OSS Risk & Compliance post, then determine how enterprise feedback could produce useful, actionable insights for the package-maintenance team; done means an agreed engagement approach or concrete next steps.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
node.js
Domain
developer-experience
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
18/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.