nodejs / nodejs/node

fs.cpSync fails with EACCES when the destination is on a Docker bind mount (regression in 22.17)

Open
#65,497 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
122k
Forks
37.3k
Avg merge
4d 2h
Merged PRs (30d)
283

Description

Version

v22.17.1 (also v22.18.0, v22.20.0, v22.23.2, v24.19.0). Last good: v22.16.0.

Platform

Docker Desktop on macOS (Darwin 25.5.0, arm64), default VirtioFS file sharing. Reproduced with the official node:*-slim images, so the container distro is Debian bookworm.

Subsystem

fs

What steps will reproduce the bug?

fs.cpSync(src, dest, { recursive: true }) throws EACCES when dest is on a Docker bind mount. The same call succeeds on 22.16.0, and on 22.17.1 it succeeds when dest is on the container's own filesystem.

On a macOS host:

mkdir -p /tmp/repro/src/nested
printf 'a' > /tmp/repro/src/file.txt
printf 'b' > /tmp/repro/src/nested/inner.txt

for V in 22.16 22.17; do
  docker run --rm -v /tmp/repro:/mnt/repro -w /mnt/repro node:$V-slim node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const dest = 'out-' + process.version.replace(/[^0-9]/g, '_');
try { fs.cpSync('src', dest, { recursive: true }); console.log(process.version, 'OK'); }
catch (e) { console.log(process.version, 'FAIL', e.code, e.syscall, e.path); }
"
done

Output:

v22.16.0 OK
v22.17.1 FAIL EACCES cp out-_22_17_1
How often does it reproduce?

Every time, on every version from 22.17.1 onward that I tested.

What is the expected behavior?

cpSync copies the tree, as it does on 22.16.0 and as cp -R does on the same path in the same container.

What do you see instead?
Error: EACCES: permission denied, cp 'out-_22_17_1'
Additional information

This is not a permission problem. In a single container run on 22.17.1, with the bind mount as CWD:

node v22.17.1
  FAIL dest on bind mount        EACCES cp bind-dest
  OK   dest on container fs
  control: id=0 access(W_OK)=yes
  control: mkdirSync on bind mount OK
  control: copyFileSync on bind mount OK
  control: cp -R OK

So, on the very path that cpSync rejects:

  • the process is root (uid 0) — it also fails as a non-root uid matching the host owner;
  • fs.accessSync(dir, W_OK) succeeds;
  • fs.mkdirSync succeeds;
  • fs.copyFileSync succeeds;
  • coreutils cp -R succeeds;
  • fs.cpSync with the same source and a destination on the container's own filesystem succeeds.

Only the combination of cpSync + a bind-mount destination fails.

cpSync does partially complete before throwing: the destination directory is created and at least one entry is copied, so a retry then sees EEXIST/ENOTEMPTY. That makes the failure messy to recover from in a build pipeline.

Bisect (identical mount, source, destination and uid; only the Node binary varies):

Version Result
22.13.1 OK
22.14.0 OK
22.16.0 OK
22.17.1 EACCES
22.18.0 EACCES
22.20.0 EACCES
22.23.2 EACCES
24.19.0 EACCES

The boundary lines up with the C++ reimplementation of cpSync, which landed in 22.17. The mechanism is below.

Real-world impact. @nx/next:build finishes by copying the app's public/ directory into its output path with exactly this call:

cpSync(join(projectRoot, 'public'), join(options.outputPath, 'public'), {
  dereference: true,
  recursive: true,
});

Any Next.js build run inside a container against a bind-mounted workspace therefore fails on Node ≥ 22.17 — after the build has already compiled and typechecked successfully, so it presents as a mysterious late-stage permission error rather than an obvious environment problem. Related historical regressions in the same function: #54285, #54782.

Root cause. Reduced to raw syscalls in the container, as root:

FAIL open dest O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC mode 0200   errno=13 (Permission denied)
OK   open dest O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC mode 0644
FAIL reopen the 0200 file O_WRONLY                  errno=13 (Permission denied)

libstdc++'s do_copy_file creates the destination with S_IWUSR (0200) and fchmods it to the source's mode afterwards. This mount refuses to open a mode-0200 file for writing, so the create fails. uv_fs_copyfile creates the destination with the source's mode and is unaffected.

That is confirmed outside Node entirely — plain C++ with gcc 14 and libstdc++, same mount:

FAIL copy_file  mount -> mount   value=13 msg=Permission denied
OK   copy_file  mount -> /tmp
OK   copy_file  /tmp  -> /tmp
FAIL copy_file  /tmp  -> mount   value=13 msg=Permission denied

Which is why cpSync is inconsistent with itself, on one mount in one process:

Call Result Path taken
cpSync(file, newDest) OK JS falls through to copyFileSync (libuv)
cpSync(file, existingDest) EACCES CpSyncOverrideFile, mode == 0 branch
cpSync(dirWithAFile, dest) EACCES CpSyncCopyDir, regular-file branch
cpSync(dirNoFiles, dest) OK no file is ever copied

fs.copyFileSync works on this mount because it uses uv_fs_copyfile. Both failing paths already have a libuv sibling in node_file.cc; they just do not take it.

Workaround. Pin to 22.16.x, or arrange for the destination to live on the container's own filesystem rather than the bind mount.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start in node_file.cc at the C++ cpSync paths named in the report, especially the regular-file branches that use libstdc++ file copying instead of the existing libuv sibling. Reproduce with the Docker bind-mount commands and compare cpSync with copyFileSync. Done means recursive cpSync copies files successfully on the affected bind mount without the partial-copy failure.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp, javascript, node.js
Domain
backend, operating-systems
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.