nodejs / nodejs/node

24.19.0: `node::ObjectWrap` cleanup hooks backported without the cleanup hook registry, aborts on every 24.x runtime

Open
#65,446 1 comment 4 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

addons
Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
122k
Forks
37.3k
Avg merge
4d 2h
Merged PRs (30d)
283

Description

Version

v24.19.0 (also affects v24.x-staging)

Platform
Reproduced on: Darwin 25.5.0 arm64 (official darwin-arm64 tarballs)
Originally hit on: Linux x86_64, Debian 13 container
Subsystem

src, addons

What steps will reproduce the bug?

This is the 24.x counterpart of #65262, but with an important difference: on the 24.x line
the crash does not need a header/runtime version mismatch. Headers and runtime both at
24.19.0 abort deterministically.

addon.cc (same minimal reproducer as #65262):

#include <node.h>
#include <node_object_wrap.h>

using namespace v8;

class Thing : public node::ObjectWrap {
 public:
  static void New(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) {
    (new Thing())->Wrap(args.This());
  }
};

void Init(Local<Object> exports) {
  Isolate* isolate = Isolate::GetCurrent();
  Local<Context> context = isolate->GetCurrentContext();
  Local<FunctionTemplate> tpl = FunctionTemplate::New(isolate, Thing::New);
  tpl->InstanceTemplate()->SetInternalFieldCount(1);
  exports->Set(context,
               String::NewFromUtf8(isolate, "Thing").ToLocalChecked(),
               tpl->GetFunction(context).ToLocalChecked()).Check();
}

NODE_MODULE(NODE_GYP_MODULE_NAME, Init)

index.js:

const { Thing } = require(process.argv[2]);

let junk = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 300000; i++) {
  new Thing();                          // wrapped object, immediately unreachable
  junk.push({ a: i });                  // keep allocation rate high so V8 collects on its own
  if (junk.length > 1000) junk = [];
}
console.log('survived');

Build against each header set and run each binary on each runtime:

for V in 24.18.1 24.19.0; do
  curl -sfLO "https://nodejs.org/dist/v$V/node-v$V-darwin-arm64.tar.gz"
  tar -xzf "node-v$V-darwin-arm64.tar.gz"
  clang++ -std=c++20 -fPIC -shared -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup \
    -I"node-v$V-darwin-arm64/include/node" \
    -DNODE_GYP_MODULE_NAME=addon -o "addon-hdr-$V.node" addon.cc
done

for HV in 24.18.1 24.19.0; do
  for RV in 24.18.1 24.19.0; do
    ./node-v$RV-darwin-arm64/bin/node index.js "./addon-hdr-$HV.node"
    echo "hdr $HV / rt $RV -> rc=$?"
  done
done
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Deterministic, 5/5 runs for both crashing combinations.

hdr \ rt 24.18.1 24.19.0
24.18.1 ok ok
24.19.0 crash crash

Compare with the 26.x matrix in #65262, where headers 26.4.0 on runtime 26.4.0 is fine.
As in that issue, an explicit global.gc() does not trigger it; the collection has to be
allocation driven.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

An addon that uses node::ObjectWrap and is built against 24.19.0 headers should keep
working on a 24.19.0 runtime. Today there is no 24.x runtime it works on.

What do you see instead?
#  node[52504]: void node::RemoveEnvironmentCleanupHook(Isolate *, CleanupHook, void *) at ../src/api/hooks.cc:142
#  Assertion failed: (env) != nullptr

1: node::Assert(node::AssertionInfo const&) [node]
2: node::RemoveEnvironmentCleanupHook(v8::Isolate*, void (*)(void*), void*) (.cold.1) [node]
4: node::ObjectWrap::RemoveCleanupHook() [addon-hdr-24.19.0.node]
5: node::ObjectWrap::~ObjectWrap() [addon-hdr-24.19.0.node]
Additional information

The cause looks like a partial backport. 24.19.0 picked up src: add cleanup hooks to node::ObjectWrap (#63642), which adds AddCleanupHook() to the constructor and
RemoveCleanupHook() to the destructor of the header only node::ObjectWrap class. It did
not pick up 1723773d4133fc71215a9cbb7e2b9a2a11fc3688 (src: keep global list of addon-provided cleanup hooks), which is what makes hook removal survive without a live
Environment and which is why the 26.x matrix in #65262 has a working diagonal.

$ curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nodejs/node/v24.19.0/src/node_object_wrap.h | grep -c 'RemoveCleanupHook()'
2
$ curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nodejs/node/v24.19.0/src/api/hooks.cc | grep -c CleanupHookThunk
0
$ curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nodejs/node/v26.4.0/src/api/hooks.cc | grep -c CleanupHookThunk
6

v24.x-staging is currently in the same state, and v24.19.0 is the newest v24 tag, so
every published 24.x runtime is affected once an addon is compiled with 24.19.0 headers.

Because node_object_wrap.h is header only, this reaches users who never changed a
dependency: rebuilding a container image after 2026-08-03 is enough, since the new
destructor code gets compiled into the addon. It hits NAN style addons in particular,
because they commonly do using namespace node; and inherit from node::ObjectWrap.

Real world example that led me here: a long running service in a Docker image, no
dependency version changed, only the Node base image moved 24.18.0 -> 24.19.0. The process
started aborting during periodic SFTP transfers, when the garbage collector reclaimed one
of ssh2's native cipher objects:

#  node[7]: void node::RemoveEnvironmentCleanupHook(v8::Isolate*, CleanupHook, void*) at ../../src/api/hooks.cc:142
#  Assertion failed: (env) != nullptr

1: node::Assert(node::AssertionInfo const&) [node]
2: node::RemoveEnvironmentCleanupHook(v8::Isolate*, void (*)(void*), void*) [node]
3: AESGCMDecipher::~AESGCMDecipher() [<app>/node_modules/ssh2/lib/protocol/crypto/build/Release/sshcrypto.node]

Downstream reports of the same assertion with other NAN style addons (better-sqlite3,
node-pty) after the same base image move: nexu-io/open-design#6462.

Possible ways out, in order of preference from a user point of view:

  1. Backport 1723773d to v24.x-staging so RemoveEnvironmentCleanupHook no longer needs
    a live Environment.
  2. Or revert #63642 on the 24.x line until 1 is done.

Refs: #63642 #65262 #65195

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with src/node_object_wrap.h and src/api/hooks.cc, then reproduce the header/runtime matrix using the provided addon.cc and index.js allocation loop. Compare the 24.x state with commit 1723773d and the related #63642 changes. Done means a 24.19.0-built ObjectWrap addon survives allocation-driven collection on the 24.19.0 runtime without the cleanup-hook assertion.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp, nodejs
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.