LFIT Jenkins transition to GHA POC
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 202
- Forks
- 183
- Avg merge
- 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
While acknowledging that transitioning all pipelines and jobs to GitHub Actions (GHA) may not be practical, recent GH changes to self-hosted and free runners along with container options create opportunities for a more extensive migration of pipelines and jobs. With this in mind, as part of the Sovereign Tech Fund initiative, we would like to do a POC for the BWG and are requesting admin access to github.com/nodejs
GitHub
username: lfreleng-github
Thank you,
Vanessa Valderrama
LF Release Engineering
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or pipeline entry points. Start by clarifying the BWG proof-of-concept scope, the Jenkins pipelines and jobs involved, and the required GitHub organization access. Done means an agreed migration proof of concept and a documented decision on next steps.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- ci-cd, devops
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100