nmfs-ost / nmfs-ost/journals

Incorrect family names for authors because of affiliation script

Open
#8 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

incorrect metadata
Dominant language
TeX
Stars
16
Forks
1
Avg merge
3d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Publishers often use alpha, i.e., [a-z], superscripts to denote affiliations for authors and when retrieving journal information from stored metadata the superscripts can appear as though they are part of the author's family names. When these superscripts are numeric, they do not pose a problem.

How to search for authors of the form XXXX versus XXXX[a-z] when both can be legitimate? For example,

        Montresorc               Marina
        Montresor                Marina

        Gabele                   T.
        Gabel                    Thomas

the first example represents an error and the second example represents two legitimate author names.

Ideas

  • When family names are similar as in both of these examples, we could search the html for both names using curl and grep.
  • Nelson created awk programs to split and organize names such as the list above.
  • use orcid to check names

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue identifies an affiliation script but no file or test. Start by locating that script and compare the Montresor/Montresorc and Gabel/Gabele examples; the proposed HTML search with curl and grep may help investigate the source metadata. Done should prevent affiliation letters from becoming family names without changing legitimate author names.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
awk
Domain
data
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.