nmfs-ost / nmfs-ost/fishdictionary
Term for relative measure of abundance (index vs. cpue)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
While giving the presentation on input and output for FIMS there was a lot of tangential discussion surrounding the decision to use CPUE for everything rather than index. Some complaints were that not all measures of abundance are relative or a measure of catch standardized by effort. I was thinking that everything would be a CPUE because at some level you are always measuring effort but it is accounted for in some hidden way. I think that less people have a problem with index meaning multiple things beyond "index of population abundance". I searched the literature trying to find a different word and even in literature about bird, deer, and other animal populations it seems like they use "index" quite heavily. Do we have other options? Do people have a preference for one term over another?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the issue text and its two comments to understand the unresolved terminology discussion around “index” and “CPUE.” Done means reaching a documented decision on the preferred term and defining the scope of any resulting dictionary change; no files or tests are named in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100