nmfs-ost / nmfs-ost/fishdictionary
Create a GHA workflow to validate submitted terms
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I think the idea is slightly different, but in case it is helpful, I recently setup a job to validate JSON files using a JSON schema for the FIT webpages: https://github.com/noaa-fisheries-integrated-toolbox/toolbox_web_templating/blob/main/.github/workflows/validate_json_config.yml (not sure if you have access, but I can add you if needed!)
Originally posted by @k-doering-NOAA in https://github.com/nmfs-fish-tools/fishdictionary/issues/37#issuecomment-1270038825
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the referenced .github/workflows/validate_json_config.yml workflow for the proposed validation pattern. Then inspect this repository for how terms are submitted and what validation rules exist; the work is done when a GitHub Actions workflow validates submitted terms, though the issue does not define the schema or failure criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- ci-cd
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100