API documentation for nitclk is badly formatted in many places
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
docs
nitclk
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 128
- Forks
- 110
- Avg merge
- 5d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
Description of issue
The API documentation for nitclk is badly formatted in a lot of places, resulting in confusing and partially unreadable documentation.
Some examples:
and
And, most notably:
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the nitclk API documentation shown in the issue screenshots and identify the corresponding formatting problems. Trace each affected section to its documentation source, then verify that the previously confusing examples and text are readable and consistently formatted.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- api, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100