Performance benchmarking for table use cases
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 39
- Forks
- 14
- Avg merge
- 1d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Description
😯 Problem to Solve
This feature tracks the performance testing that we want to do before telling clients that the table is ready to use. At this point it's a starting point for discussion and a placeholder to remind us to do something.
💁 Proposed Solution
Possible ideas:
- do nothing. Rely on previously completed manual testing
- do another round of manual testing
- Prioritize #614 and add cases for important table behaviors
- add performance test infrastructure (e.g. Lighthouse) to an SLE app and track how much of the time spent rendering a page is table rendering vs other factors like network activity
📋 Tasks
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by resolving which proposed direction to pursue: manual testing, the cases in #614, or performance infrastructure such as Lighthouse in an SLE app. Define the table use cases, measurement approach, and completion criteria before choosing files or tests, since the issue names none.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- performance, testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100