Can probably go faster than the cast/STUArray method
Open
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I think we can do better than the STUArray method, see
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4092#comment:20
I've not actually run in in the reinterpret-cast benchmark, but looking at th CMM code it really looks like it ought to be faster, since it's the same worker, but without an extra allocation and a two calls.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.