[Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions

Describe the problem you have identified

I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.

• Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
• Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)

GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:

Did you use AI assistance?
[ ] No
[ ] Yes

If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?

Then add:

Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples

Which product or products does this problem relate to?

Other

If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.

No response

What is the expected or desired behaviour?

No response

Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?

No response

Any additional information

No response

Start by reviewing the repository's PR templates and the proposed Vale, markdown lint, link checking, documentation tests, and security review requirements. Confirm the project's policy on AI-assisted submissions and define the accepted questions and checks; the issue currently leaves the desired behavior and completion criteria open.