Question about fastp trimming
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Nextflow
- Stars
- 174
- Forks
- 125
- Avg merge
- 1h 17m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hello,
thanks to share this pipeline.
I was wondering why fastp trimming is only used with FusionCatcher but not with Arriba and Star-fusion ?
Did you perform any benchmark leading to this choice ? Or do you have some references ?
Thanks a lot for your answer,
Best regards,
Kevin
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review how fastp trimming is configured for FusionCatcher, Arriba, and STAR-Fusion in the pipeline. Determine whether benchmark results or references explain the differing treatment, then document the rationale or provide the requested evidence in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100