More meaningful name for field in input_schema.json, especially for the meta data
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Nextflow
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
Description of the bug
These meta data are not that well definined and could be more informative/self descriptive:
- source
- source_vcf
- source_version
Command used and terminal output
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading input_schema.json and locate the definitions and uses of source, source_vcf, and source_version. Determine clearer self-descriptive names for the metadata fields, then verify that the schema and every referenced use remain consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- json
- Domain
- bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100