Investigate use of specifying `size` in groupTuple operations to improve efficiency
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Nextflow
- Stars
- 321
- Forks
- 156
- Avg merge
- 12h 59m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Description of feature
As originally suggested by @ramprasadn here: https://github.com/nf-core/mag/pull/499#discussion_r1318384733
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the discussion linked from the issue, especially the suggestion about specifying size in groupTuple operations. Then locate the relevant workflow operations in the nf-core/mag pipeline and determine which changes would improve efficiency; done means documenting or implementing a concrete, validated approach.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- bioinformatics, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100