nextflow-io / nextflow-io/nextflow

Embedded cache DB alternative

Open
#2,774 13 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

  • #6255 by @pditommaso — closed without merging
stale
Dominant language
Groovy
Stars
3.5k
Forks
811
Avg merge
2d 11h
Merged PRs (30d)
61

Description

Bug report

Nextflow tasks metadata is stored into a local embedded key-value database based on LevelDB.

This provides good performance, however, the LevelDB store has some stability issues on specific hardware/file systems causing and represent blocking factor for those users. See for example: https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow/issues/2377, https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow/issues/403, https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow/issues/351 and https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow/issues/309

The goal of this issue is to explore the use of lmdbjava as alternative storage for nextflow tasks metadata

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Review the LevelDB-based task-metadata storage and the related issues #2377, #403, #351, and #309, then inspect closed PR #6255 for prior exploration. Done means reaching a clear decision on the lmdbjava alternative and, if pursued, validating it against the reported stability problems.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
groovy, java
Domain
backend, databases
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.