[question] Why does talk implement an own poll logic instead of using the polls backend?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
feature: integration 📦
feature: polls 📊
- Dominant language
- PHP
- Stars
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 587
- Avg merge
- 18h 27m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 333
Description
@nickvergessen Just wondering, since I read the announcement. This could have been a good POC for integrating polls a little bit more.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing the referenced polls announcement and the existing Talk poll logic, then compare it with the polls backend; the issue does not define an implementation scope or a verifiable definition of done.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100