Difference between FixedChannelPool and SimpleChannelPool
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 35.1k
- Forks
- 16.3k
- Avg merge
- 1d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 143
Description
Caused by my issue #9603 i try to understand the consequences of using SimpleChannelPool instead of a FixedChannelPool (with maxConnections set to 1).
According the javadoc, SimpleChannelPool acquire
Tries to retrieve healthy channel from the pool if any or creates a new channel otherwise.
So, what does "healthy" mean? In which cases would I get an additional channel, if I use SimpleChannelPool instead of FixedChannelPool (with maxConnections set to 1)?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Javadocs and implementations of SimpleChannelPool and FixedChannelPool, focusing on acquire behavior and the meaning of a healthy channel. Document when SimpleChannelPool may create an additional channel compared with FixedChannelPool configured with maxConnections set to 1, including the consequences described by the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100