netanelcyber / netanelcyber/AdPentestAI-Python

Feature: Performance optimization for large-scale scans

Open
#33 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

enhancement optimization performance
Dominant language
Python
Stars
5
Forks
2
Avg merge
22h 25m
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Description

Feature: Performance Optimization for Large-Scale Scans\n\n### Overview\nOptimize adpentest to handle large Active Directory environments with thousands of users/computers.\n\n### Performance Goals\n- Current: Handle ~1000 objects (good)\n- Target: Handle 50,000+ objects efficiently\n- Expected speedup: 3-5x faster scans\n\n### Optimization Strategies\n\n#### 1. Connection Pooling\npython\n# Current: New LDAP connection per query\n# Proposed: Reuse connection pool\n\nclass LDAPConnectionPool:\n def __init__(self, min_size=5, max_size=20):\n self.pool = queue.Queue(maxsize=max_size)\n \n def acquire(self):\n \"\"\"Get connection from pool\"\"\"\n \n def release(self, conn):\n \"\"\"Return connection to pool\"\"\"\n\n\n#### 2. Batch Processing\npython\n# Current: Query users one-by-one\n# Proposed: Batch LDAP queries\n\n# Fetch 1000 users in single query instead of 1000 queries\nfilter_str = '(|(uid=user1)(uid=user2)...(uid=user1000))'\nresults = ldap_conn.search(search_base, filter_str)\n\n\n#### 3. Caching Strategy\npython\n# Cache frequently accessed data\n\nclass ADCache:\n def __init__(self, ttl=300): # 5 minute TTL\n self.cache = {}\n self.ttl = ttl\n \n def get_domain_info(self, domain):\n \"\"\"Cached domain info queries\"\"\"\n \n def get_user_spns(self, username):\n \"\"\"Cached SPN lookups\"\"\"\n\n\n#### 4. Parallel Tool Execution\npython\n# Current: 16 workers\n# Proposed: Adaptive worker pool based on system resources\n\ndef get_optimal_workers():\n \"\"\"Calculate optimal thread count\"\"\"\n cpu_count = os.cpu_count()\n memory_gb = psutil.virtual_memory().total / (1024**3)\n \n # 1 worker per CPU + 1 per 2GB RAM\n return min(cpu_count + int(memory_gb / 2), 64)\n\n\n#### 5. DNS Query Optimization\npython\n# Current: Individual SRV queries\n# Proposed: Batch DNS queries with caching\n\nclass DNSCache:\n def __init__(self):\n self.cache = {} # Query -> [results]\n self.negative_cache = set() # Failed queries\n \n def bulk_resolve(self, hostnames):\n \"\"\"Resolve multiple hostnames in parallel\"\"\"\n\n\n#### 6. Memory Optimization\npython\n# Use generators instead of lists for large result sets\n\ndef enumerate_users(ldap_conn, domain):\n \"\"\"Yields users instead of returning full list\"\"\"\n # Avoids loading 50k+ users into memory at once\n for user in ldap_conn.search_stream(...):\n yield user\n\n\n#### 7. Smart Tool Selection\npython\n# Skip redundant tools based on results\n\nclass SmartToolExecutor:\n def should_execute(self, tool, results_so_far):\n \"\"\"Determine if tool provides new information\"\"\"\n # Skip bloodhound if no AD structure detected\n # Skip kerberos tools if no DCs found\n # Skip email tools if SMTP not discovered\n\n\n### Benchmarking\n\n#### Current Performance (v1.1.2a)\n\nEnvironment: 1000 users, 100 computers\nTime: ~45 seconds\nThreads: 16\nMemory: 150MB\n\n\n#### Target Performance\n\nEnvironment: 50,000 users, 5000 computers\nTime: < 5 minutes (estimated)\nThreads: 32-64 (adaptive)\nMemory: < 500MB (with generators)\n\n\n### Implementation Tasks\n- [ ] Implement connection pooling\n- [ ] Add batch LDAP queries\n- [ ] Implement caching layer\n- [ ] Optimize tool execution order\n- [ ] Add DNS query batching\n- [ ] Convert to generators for large result sets\n- [ ] Add memory profiling\n- [ ] Benchmark improvements\n- [ ] Document performance tuning\n\n### Configuration Options\nbash\n# Allow users to tune for their environment\nadpentest --target domain.local \\\n --max-threads 64 \\\n --batch-size 1000 \\\n --cache-ttl 300 \\\n --memory-limit 1000 \\\n --disable-caching # For very dynamic environments\n\n\n### Monitoring & Profiling\npython\n# Add performance metrics to output\n\n{\n \"performance\": {\n \"total_time\": 45.2,\n \"ldap_time\": 15.3,\n \"dns_time\": 8.2,\n \"tool_execution_time\": 21.7,\n \"avg_thread_utilization\": 0.85,\n \"cache_hits\": 1234,\n \"cache_misses\": 56,\n \"peak_memory_mb\": 150,\n \"queries_per_second\": 45.3\n }\n}\n\n\n### Priority\nMedium-High - Important for enterprise environments\n\n### Related Issues\n- #1: DNS timeout handling\n- #5: Large environment testing\n

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the scan, LDAP, DNS, and tool-execution entry points, then establish the stated v1.1.2a baseline of 1,000 users and 100 computers. Compare each proposed optimization against the 50,000-user target, memory and timing goals, and related issues #1 and #5; done requires measured benchmarks and documented tuning options.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend, networking, performance
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.