Should we return all of the instance details when changing its configuration or status?

When changing an instances configuration or status, we return entire instance configuration. E.g

aura instance update 74fdfdba --memory 16GB

{
	"data": {
		"cdc_enrichment_mode": "OFF",
		"cloud_provider": "gcp",
		"connection_url": "neo4j+s://74fdfdba.databases.neo4j.io",
		"id": "74fdfdba",
		"memory": "8GB",
		"metrics_integration_url": "https://customer-metrics-api.neo4j.io/api/v1/ad69ee24-25fc-5a66-af02-ff8d3cc23611/74fdfdba/metrics",
		"name": "[JG]CLI]\n",
		"region": "europe-west1",
		"secondaries_count": 0,
		"status": "resizing",
		"storage": "16GB",
		"tenant_id": "ad69ee24-25fc-5a66-af02-ff8d3cc23611",
		"type": "enterprise-db"
	}
}

In this particular case, returning all of the information can cause confusion as the memory still shows the old value of 8gb rather than the new 16gb. The new value will only be shown when the resizing operation is completed.

When an instance is configuration is changed, paused or resumed, we should only return the 'status' value to the end user with the CLI ( yes the aura API returns way more, but we don't need to show that ).

Start by tracing the CLI commands for instance configuration changes, pause, and resume, using the aura instance update 74fdfdba --memory 16GB example as the behavior to reproduce. Check how their responses are formatted and change the CLI output so these operations expose only the instance status; verify that the updated status is shown without presenting stale configuration values.