nebari-dev / nebari-dev/data-science-pack

README: add prerequisites and known limitations sections

Open Beginner friendly
#125 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

size: S
Dominant language
Python
Stars
5
Forks
7
Avg merge
1d 20h
Merged PRs (30d)
13

Description

Checklist items [A]:

Prerequisites documented (NIC version, cluster sizing, namespace labels, external dependencies)
README includes prerequisites and a "Known Limitations" section

The README's only prerequisites today are local-dev tooling (Docker, ctlptl, Tilt). Missing for a customer pilot:

  • Supported NIC version(s) and the nebari-operator dependency (NebariApp CRD, OIDC client provisioning)
  • Keycloak expectations (bitnami/keycloakx, keycloak namespace, nebari realm, admin credentials secret for the rbac bootstrap job)
  • RWX StorageClass requirement for shared storage (currently buried in the Shared Storage section)
  • Rough cluster sizing

Known limitations should collect what is currently scattered: the in-cluster NFS server workaround and its tracked removal (#29), the z2jh extraVolumes/extraVolumeMounts replace-not-merge behavior, and anything else the team knows about.

Part of #120. Related: #89 (admin setup docs).

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading the repository README, including its current prerequisites and Shared Storage section, then review the details and related issues #29 and #89. Update the README with the requested NIC, cluster, namespace, dependency, Keycloak, storage, and sizing prerequisites, plus a Known Limitations section covering the listed constraints and tracked NFS removal.】【。} ilaasort经彩票? Nope invalid because accidental? Need ensure valid JSON, research string has weird unicode? I see final ended

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
kubernetes
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
78/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.