Decide whether to grant Nerd Fonts an exception to the Reserved Font Name
@benelog is already working on this.
Since Jul 28, 2026.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 237
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Nerd Fonts asked whether D2Coding can grant an exception to its Reserved Font Name, so that a patched build that only adds glyphs may keep the name D2Coding Nerd Font.
Request: https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/discussions/1968#discussioncomment-17807000
Reply so far: https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/discussions/1968#discussioncomment-17813925
Background
- The RFN is not new in 1.3.3.
with Reserved Font Name D2Codingcomes from the original 2015 license text, which lived only in the project wiki until it was moved intoLICENSE.mdandOFL.txtthis month. - No release archive before 1.3.3 contained a license file, so the restriction was not visible to tooling. Nerd Fonts still lists D2Coding as
OFL-1.1-no-RFNin theirlicense-audit.md. - The same RFN therefore already applies to the 1.3.2 based
D2Coding Nerd Fontthey ship today. - Nerd Fonts has pinned D2Coding to 1.3.2 for their 3.5.0 release. 1.3.3 is metadata only, so nothing is lost by that in the meantime.
What needs to happen
- Discuss with the person who handles open source licensing at NAVER whether to grant the exception, and decide the scope: Nerd Fonts only, or any patched build that adds glyphs without modifying existing ones.
- If granted, record the written permission in the repository. The SIL guidance is to keep
OFL.txtuntouched and put the permission in a separate file, so something likePERMISSIONS.mdat the root, linked fromREADME.mdand included in the release archive bytools/release.py. - Report the decision back on the Nerd Fonts discussion thread.
- Ask Nerd Fonts to correct the
OFL-1.1-no-RFNentry inlicense-audit.mdregardless of the outcome, or send them a pull request.
Open question
The font name table (name ID 7) declares D2Coding is a registered trademark of NAVER Corporation. That wording predates this repository and was carried over from the NHN era. Whether an actual trademark registration exists has not been confirmed, and it is worth checking while the licensing question is being discussed.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.