ROCm: EXL3 runs through two CPU reference operations
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 423
- Forks
- 53
- Avg merge
- 20h 26m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 310
Description
Row: QUANT-EXL3
The ROCm model sweep ran llama32-1b-exl3-3bpw on strix:gpu0 (gfx1151, ROCm 7.2.4) through the public vllm-cli path.
The model completed one greedy token, but provider statistics reported two CPU reference operations:
[vt reference-tier] op=CastF16 device=rocm:0 ...
[vt reference-tier] op=Exl3Gemm device=rocm:0 ...
The run finished in 1.436 seconds for one output token. That number is diagnostic only. docs/ROCM.md forbids a performance result with reference-tier hits.
The BF16 control llama32-1b-instruct-bf16 completed on the same binary and device with zero reference-tier hits. This isolates the gap to the EXL3 path rather than the Llama loader, paged attention, sampler, or base dense model.
Evidence:
- rc job
43267dc3-52c5-43b2-b6b7-538aff68e6b6 /mnt/nas_share/rc/rocm-model-sweep-v2/llama32-exl3.err- checkpoint
/workspace/ckpt/llama32-1b-exl3-3bpw
Acceptance:
- Native ROCm
CastF16andExl3Gemmpass their CPU-oracle operation gates. - The same Llama EXL3 checkpoint completes with zero reference-tier hits.
- Greedy output matches the BF16 target under the existing EXL3 correctness contract.
- Repeated warm-leg throughput is recorded against the BF16 control with AMD clock attribution.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with docs/ROCM.md and reproduce the llama32-1b-exl3-3bpw run through the public vllm-cli path on the stated ROCm device, using the referenced error log as evidence. Trace the CastF16 and Exl3Gemm CPU-oracle operation gates and compare with the BF16 control. Done means native ROCm gates pass, the EXL3 run has zero reference-tier hits, output matches the existing correctness contract, and warm-leg throughput is recorded.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- backend, machine-learning, performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100