mudler / mudler/luet

RFC: Client database

Open
#16 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

area/funtoo enhancement
Dominant language
Go
Stars
307
Forks
30
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

For trace installed/available packages we need a system from client side. The idea is to use a NoSQL/K-V database.
Here, the possibilities are:

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the client-side package tracing requirements in the issue and comparing the listed NoSQL/K-V options: BoltDB, DGraph, and Badger. Done means the database direction is selected and the client-side system for tracing installed and available packages has a defined implementation plan.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go
Domain
databases
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.